Global Methanol Deaths Continue to Rise: 15,000 and Counting


How can we track a pair of shoes delivered to your doorstep in real time, yet cannot trace a lethal chemical shipment once it leaves the dock?

That single question exposes one of the most dangerous regulatory failures of our time.

Over the past decade, more than 14,800 people have died worldwide from methanol poisoning, according to a global database compiled by Médecins Sans Frontières and Oslo University Hospital and reported by The Guardian. Nearly 80 countries have recorded fatal outbreaks since roughly 2015. Entire villages wiped out. Families blinded. Emergency rooms were overwhelmed.

And yet the global methanol trade keeps booming.

At the center of this shadow economy sits Tricon Energy, a USA based chemical and global trader with sales in excess of USD $10 Billion that openly describes itself as the Walmart of chemicals. Public disclosures show explosive growth, with tens of millions of tons of chemicals moved annually across borders.

Cheap. Fast. Everywhere.

That scale brings power. But it should also bring responsibility.

Methanol a commodity without accountability

Methanol is a high volume industrial chemical used in fuels, solvents, plastics, and energy production. It moves through ports, tankers, terminals, traders, and distributors by the millions of tons every year.

Yet methanol is still shipped without mandatory tracers, markers, or chemical fingerprints.

Once it leaves the supplier and passes through intermediaries, it becomes effectively anonymous. When it later appears in adulterated fuel, counterfeit alcohol, or criminal supply chains, investigators hit a wall.

No tag.
No trail.
No accountability.

This is not a technical limitation. It is a regulatory choice.

Brazil’s latest death toll adds urgency

In Brazil, the human toll of methanol poisoning has sharply increased.

In late 2025, the Ministry of Health reported at least 22 confirmed deaths from methanol intoxication linked to adulterated alcoholic beverages and hundreds of cases nationwide. In early February 2026, the São Paulo state government confirmed its 12th methanol related fatality, with at least 52 confirmed poisonings.

This is not an isolated tragedy.
This is a growing public health crisis.

Bio Clean Energy; a clean energy dream destroyed

I lived this experience and for this reason I am speaking out.

I founded a large-scale commercial biodiesel facility in São Paulo, Brazil, authorized by the National Petroleum Agency (ANP) to produce up to 110 million liters of biodiesel per year. The operation was fully licensed, industrial in scale, and designed to supply renewable fuel into Brazil’s regulated energy market.

Then my company was invaded by the mafia called PCC, specifically Mohammed Hussein Mourad.

I personally issued or participated in nine formal notifications to Tricon Energy, our methanol supplier, to not ship methanol prior to and during the invasion, those warnings were ignored.

PCC actor, Mohamad Hussein Mourad was physically present at the Bio Clean Energy facility (Subsidiary Bio Petro in Araraquara, SP).. The facility was invaded. Access was taken. Operations were disrupted. Control was asserted by criminal actors.

I was locked out of my own plant.

I did not walk away.

I flew from the United States to Brazil to confront what was happening and to attempt to regain control through lawful means. When I arrived and found the facility effectively taken over, I entered my own plant by jumping the fence, knowing the personal risk, because abandoning it would have meant surrendering it entirely to criminal control.

Immediately afterward, I filed a formal police report documenting the invasion, the loss of control, and Mourad’s presence on site. I also recorded and publicly posted video evidence in real time to create a permanent public record.

I confronted the situation.
I documented it.
I reported it.
I sought institutional help.
I did not stay silent.

Unfortunately, my new security team was bribed by the mafia within 48 hours and the police reports yielded no investigation. I was unable to enter my own company and stop the crime.


This crime led to the entire investment loss of the facility and created numerous financial burdens. We are waiting for justice in Brazil and the United States with legal actions running against Tricon Energy for shipping against my 9 written instructions and against Bradesco Bank for allowing 3rd parties to use my account to pay for methanol. 


We are attempting to hold Tricon Energy accountable and this case is in front of the STJ of Brazil.

Banco Bradesco

My bank statements showed unauthorized third parties with no legitimate business relationship depositing millions of dollars into accounts connected to my operation to pay for methanol.

Banco Bradesco engaged in money laundering by allowing unauthorized third parties to pay for methanol in my company name.

My legal case in Brazil was ruled against me in 48 hours without the right to present oral arguments by three judges, a process that normally takes years. 

I am awaiting a judicial review in this case by the STF in Brazil

Liability must flow back upstream

If Tylenol is required by law to make packaging child proof, then methanol companies must be required to make downstream activity safe.

The principle is simple. When a product is inherently dangerous, responsibility does not end at the point of sale. It follows the risk.

Methanol’s lethality is known. Its diversion risk is documented. Its misuse is predictable. Allowing it to move through opaque supply chains without accountability is not neutrality. It is negligence by design.

Liability must flow back to those who profit.

The United States and India leave a paper trail

In the United States, Tricon Energy has been fined by the Environmental Protection Agency. Enforcement and compliance documents explicitly reference methanol in connection with chemical handling, reporting failures, and regulatory violations. 

India provides a second, independent paper trail.

India has suffered some of the deadliest methanol poisoning outbreaks on earth. While no criminal liability has been established against Tricon, an official Indian court record confirms that Tricon Energy UK Limited was named in proceedings before the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in 2024. That record confirms Tricon’s legal and commercial footprint in one of the world’s highest risk methanol environments.

Taken together, these records eliminate any claim of ignorance.

Know Your Customer must apply to hazardous materials

Know Your Customer in the methanol trade cannot be symbolic or voluntary. It must carry civil and criminal repercussions for every participant in the hazardous materials supply chain.

Producers, traders, brokers, distributors, transporters, terminal operators, and end buyers must all be legally obligated to verify counterparties, document end use, and flag diversion risk. When lethal chemicals are involved, ignorance cannot be a defense.

As Einstein warned in paraphrase, we cannot solve our most dangerous problems with the same thinking that created them. Treating methanol like an ordinary commodity while expecting different outcomes is regulatory denial.

Without enforceable KYC rules backed by real consequences, the system will keep rewarding volume while externalizing death.

Methanol poisoning follows the same global pattern year after year. Diversion. Adulteration. Poisoning. Death. The geography changes. The outcome does not.

This is not a philosophical debate. It is a governance failure measured in human lives.

The question history will ask

Every scandal is eventually reduced to one sentence.

Why did they not act when they knew?

Why can we track consumer goods in real time, but not lethal chemicals?
Why are suppliers not required to tag, trace, and verify every methanol shipment?
Why is Know Your Customer mandatory in banking but optional in chemical trading?

Deaths of innocents warrant and demand change.




Comments